Search 10.7 million court opinions, free. When you need a court-ready motion to dismiss or a response brief, the Motion Builder drafts one for $25, with every citation traceable to a real opinion. And when someone hands you a motion, the Motion Analyzer checks every citation in it against the real source, first one free.
Pay only when you draft a motion or analyze one. The research, court rules, citation analysis, and judge intelligence stay free.
Upload the complaint, pick the grounds, get a draft. Every citation traces to a real opinion. If a citation does not exist or does not support the proposition cited, your next motion is free or refunded.
No subscriptions. No usage caps. No per-citation fees. Pay only when you draft a motion.
Works on the motion you were served with, or on your own draft before you file it.
Upload any motion and every cited case, rule, and statute gets compared against what the source actually says. Overstated holdings, wrong-posture cases, and quotes that are not in the opinion, ranked and explained, with a click-through to the source on every flag.
Semantic search across 10.7M opinions. Ask in plain English. Ranked results with the holding pulled from the actual opinion.
Every state's procedural rules and statutes, fully searchable. About 18,000 sections loaded. The full text, every time.
Map how a case has been cited across the country. See which holdings have been followed, distinguished, or rejected.
See how a judge has ruled on similar motions before you file. Patterns, tendencies, and prior decisions in one place.
Searchable transcripts and audio of oral arguments. Hear how an issue was actually argued and decided.
Save cases as you research. Take notes. Build a personal library of authority you can come back to anytime.
General AI invents citations, rules, and case names. Sanctions follow. ClearPrecedent is built differently from the ground up.
The system can only quote text that exists in our corpus. Citations point to a passage that points to a real opinion. If we cannot point to the source, we will not write the cite.
We work from the complete text of every opinion, rule, and statute, never from summaries or snippets that lose the context a holding lives in. Accuracy beats speed, every time.
A holding bound to one statute does not get cited in a brief arguing under a different statute. The drafter cannot bridge an anti-SLAPP case into a Rule 91a argument, no matter how rhetorically close.
To plead breach of contract, a petition must allege (1) a contractual relationship between the parties, (2) the substance of the contract that supports the pleader's right to recover, and (3) a breach of the contract by the defendant. Hur v. City of Mesquite, 893 S.W.2d 227, 233 (Tex. App. 1995). The petition must set out every material part of the contract essential to the cause of action; a petition that fails to show a breach by the defendant is defective. Gonzalez, 814 S.W.2d at 112.
Count I alleges only that Summit "fail[ed] to complete the work as agreed and by performing the work in a deficient manner" (Compl. ¶ 30), without identifying which contractual provision was breached, what the agreed scope of work required, or how the work performed deviated from any specified term. That is a recitation of the breach element, not a pleading of it. Because the complaint does not supply the substance of the contract's material terms, the Court cannot ascertain from the pleading alone the basis for Plaintiff's right to recover, and Count I has no basis in law under Rule 91a.1.
A multi-stage pipeline that researches, verifies, ranks, and writes, with checks between each stage. The architecture is the reason the guarantee holds.
Semantic embeddings on every paragraph of every published opinion. Finds the controlling holding, not just keyword hits.
Each cited case is confirmed against the corpus by citation, by name, and by year. A cite that does not verify never reaches the brief.
Every quotation is lifted word-for-word from the opinion it cites and checked character-for-character against the source before the draft ships.
Independent of the limitations bar, each count fails to allege facts that, taken as true, entitle Plaintiff to the relief sought.
Every authority in a ClearPrecedent draft or analysis is a live link to its source. Verifying a cite takes one click, not an afternoon in a law library.
Click a cited case and the opinion opens in a side panel: the court, the citation, and the passage your draft relies on.
Click a statute or a procedural rule and the exact section appears, drawn from our corpus of state and federal codes and court rules.
In a Motion Analyzer report, every authority the other side cited is clickable too. Read what the case actually says beside what their motion claims it says.
The opinion opens beside your draft, with the passage it relies on quoted from the source.
The section's text, from the code itself.
The rule's text, verbatim, with the rest of the ruleset a click away.
Every citation in a ClearPrecedent motion traces back to a real source: a real court opinion in our corpus, a real statute, a real rule of procedure. Every quotation is checked character-for-character against the source text, and a motion that fails verification does not ship. The architecture refuses to invent a reporter cite or a case name, and refuses to attach a passage to a proposition the passage does not support.
If a motion ships with a citation that does not exist, or a citation that does not support the proposition cited, your next motion is free or refunded, your choice. No questions, no friction.
We make this offer because the architecture is built to keep it.
A library of in-depth guides on every common motion strategy, jurisdiction-specific quirks, and procedural traps. Plain-language explanations of the law you actually need to argue.
Browse motion strategiesHow courts decide motion-to-dismiss arguments, and the structural moves judges respond to.
How citizens-participation statutes work, what gets dismissed, and what survives.
Accrual, the discovery rule, fraudulent concealment, and savings statutes.
Search every published opinion. Draft court-ready motions. Check any motion's citations against the real source. Pay per document, never a subscription. If we hallucinate, you get the next one free.